Research Article
Biogas vs. Pipeline Gas in Rural Energy Transitions: A Comparative Sustainability Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
Received: 01 Jan 2026Revised: 01 Mar 2026Accepted: 15 Mar 2026Published: 05 Jun 2026
Abstract
Rural energy transitions in Bangladesh are central to achieving SDG 7. This study conducts a comparative sustainability assessment of biogas and pipeline gas using MCDA combining AHP weighting with TOPSIS ranking. Primary data from a household survey (n=120) in rural Cumilla. AHP prioritized environmental (0.4658) and social (0.2771) criteria. TOPSIS ranked pipeline gas as more sustainable overall. Biogas offers environmental benefits but adoption barriers limit perceived sustainability. Policy priorities include targeted subsidies, user training, and context-specific hybrid models.
Keywords
BiogasPipeline gasMCDAAHP-TOPSISRural BangladeshSustainable energySDG 7
Article Details
| Published | 2026-06-05 |
| Issue | Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026) |
| Section | Articles |
| Pages | 295-314 |
| ISSN | 2581-8430 (Online) |
How to Cite
Abedin, M. J. (2026). Biogas vs. Pipeline Gas in Rural Energy Transitions. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 9(2), 295-314.
