Home / Archives / Volume 9, Issue 2, Year 2026 / Articles
Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54392/ajir2026p3

Biogas vs. Pipeline Gas in Rural Energy Transitions: A Comparative Sustainability Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

Received: 01 Jan 2026Revised: 01 Mar 2026Accepted: 15 Mar 2026Published: 05 Jun 2026

Rural energy transitions in Bangladesh are central to achieving SDG 7. This study conducts a comparative sustainability assessment of biogas and pipeline gas using MCDA combining AHP weighting with TOPSIS ranking. Primary data from a household survey (n=120) in rural Cumilla. AHP prioritized environmental (0.4658) and social (0.2771) criteria. TOPSIS ranked pipeline gas as more sustainable overall. Biogas offers environmental benefits but adoption barriers limit perceived sustainability. Policy priorities include targeted subsidies, user training, and context-specific hybrid models.

BiogasPipeline gasMCDAAHP-TOPSISRural BangladeshSustainable energySDG 7
Published2026-06-05
IssueVol. 9 No. 2 (2026)
SectionArticles
Pages295-314
ISSN2581-8430 (Online)
Abedin, M. J. (2026). Biogas vs. Pipeline Gas in Rural Energy Transitions. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 9(2), 295-314.
Full Text
PDF available for download
PDF Download PDF